← Heatmap / MiMo V2.6 Pro · Task 102
MiMo V2.6 Pro · Tool use · Task 102 (Traps, missing month)
Mean 100.0%
| Field | Expected | Rollout #1 (100%) | Rollout #2 (100%) | Rollout #3 (100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| decision | clarify | clarify | clarify | clarify |
| reason code | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH | MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH |
| clauses | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 | R1 R7 |
Prompt
Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer. Retrieve the case inputs with list_documents and read_document. Reference rows are available only through lookup_reference. Use calculate for exact decimal arithmetic.
Rollouts
Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 11.6s · $0.0005
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me list documents first.
Tool
[
{"id": "dabcba8c02ca6959-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="dabcba8c02ca6959-payroll")Reasoning
Read the payroll document.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "5370.93", "allowed_deduction": "379.49"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record has no payroll_month, so no reference row can be selected. Please supply the payroll month in YYYY-MM format within 2026."
}
Reasoning
No payroll_month provided. Missing payroll_month → clarify with MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, cite R1 and R7. Wait - check order: gross_pay is present, payroll_month missing. So reason_code MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH. But wait, maybe there are more documents? Only one. The record lacks payroll_month. Per R7, check order: missing gross_pay first (gross_pay present), then missing payroll_month → clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH.
Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 9.7s · $0.0004
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "dabcba8c02ca6959-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="dabcba8c02ca6959-payroll")Reasoning
Read it.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "5370.93", "allowed_deduction": "379.49"}
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
"explanation": "The payroll record provides gross_pay and allowed_deduction but no payroll_month. Please supply the payroll month in YYYY-MM format within 2026 so the correct reference row can be selected."
}
Reasoning
Missing payroll_month. Check R7 order: 1. Missing gross_pay? No, gross_pay present. 2. Missing payroll_month? Yes → clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, cite R1 and R7. Wait — but the case might have other documents? Only one document. payroll_month is missing (explicitly absent, not null but missing). Required check order: gross_pay present, payroll_month missing → MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH. But wait, is gross_pay "explicit null"? No, it's present. So decision: clarify, reason_code: MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, clauses R1, R7.
Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 4 tool calls · 11.8s · $0.0006
| Component | Score | Clauses |
|---|---|---|
| decision | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| exact | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| field accuracy | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| citations | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
| explanation | 100.0% | R1 R7 |
Assistant
list_documents()Reasoning
Let me start by listing documents.
Tool
[
{"id": "dabcba8c02ca6959-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]
Assistant
read_document(document_id="dabcba8c02ca6959-payroll")lookup_reference(reference="first-half")lookup_reference(reference="second-half")Reasoning
Read the document and lookup reference.
Tool
{
"kind": "payroll",
"record": {"gross_pay": "5370.93", "allowed_deduction": "379.49"}
}
Tool
{
"reference": "first-half",
"months": ["2026-01", "2026-06"],
"rate": "0.05",
"cap": "4500.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1200.00",
"upper": "3300.00",
"middle_rate": "0.12",
"upper_rate": "0.22"
}
Tool
{
"reference": "second-half",
"months": ["2026-07", "2026-12"],
"rate": "0.06",
"cap": "5000.00",
"deduction": "400.00",
"free": "1100.00",
"upper": "3600.00",
"middle_rate": "0.14",
"upper_rate": "0.20"
}
Assistant
{
"decision": "clarify",
"reason_code": "MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH",
"explanation": "The payroll record supplies gross_pay and allowed_deduction but no payroll_month; the month is required to select a reference row. Please provide the payroll month in YYYY-MM format (within 2026).",
"clauses": ["R1", "R7"]
}
Reasoning
The payroll record has gross_pay and allowed_deduction but no payroll_month! Missing payroll_month → clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, citing R1 and R7. Wait — the record only has gross_pay and allowed_deduction. No payroll_month. Per R7 check order: gross_pay present, payroll_month missing → clarify MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH. Also no contract_gross_pay, no amendment. So decision: clarify, reason_code MISSING_PAYROLL_MONTH, clauses ["R1","R7"].