Task 107 · MiMo V2.6 Pro

← Heatmap / MiMo V2.6 Pro · Task 107

MiMo V2.6 Pro · Tool use · Task 107 (Traps, month not covered) Mean 100.0%

Field	Expected	Rollout #1 (100%)	Rollout #2 (100%)	Rollout #3 (100%)
decision	clarify	clarify	clarify	clarify
reason code	NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE	NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE	NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE	NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE
clauses	R1 R7	R1 R7	R1 R7	R1 R7

Prompt

Process this monthly payroll record under the supplied rulebook. Return the R6 or R7 JSON answer.
Retrieve the case inputs with list_documents and read_document. Reference rows are available only through lookup_reference. Use calculate for exact decimal arithmetic.

Rollouts

Rollout #1 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 10.3s · $0.0005

Component	Score	Clauses
decision	100.0%	R1 R7
exact	100.0%	R1 R7
field accuracy	100.0%	R1 R7
citations	100.0%	R1 R7
explanation	100.0%	R1 R7

Assistant

list_documents()

Reasoning

Let me start by listing documents.

Tool

[
  {"id": "6f10b60ba9a767ab-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]

Assistant

read_document(document_id="6f10b60ba9a767ab-payroll")

Reasoning

Read the payroll document.

Tool

{
  "kind": "payroll",
  "record": {"gross_pay": "6291.88", "payroll_month": "2027-07", "allowed_deduction": "228.67"}
}

Assistant

{
  "decision": "clarify",
  "reason_code": "NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE",
  "clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
  "explanation": "Payroll month 2027-07 is outside the 2026 coverage of the reference schedule, so no reference row applies. Please provide a payroll month within 2026 (or a schedule covering 2027) so the payroll can be calculated."
}

Reasoning

Payroll month is 2027-07, outside 2026. Only 2026 is covered. Dates outside 2026 require clarification under R7. That's "NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE" (R7 item 3: a month without a reference row). Actually R1 says "Only 2026 is covered. Dates outside 2026 require clarification under R7." The check order: gross_pay present, payroll_month present, then month without a reference row → NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE. So decision clarify, reason_code NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE, clauses R1 and R7.

Should I call lookup_reference? Not needed — the month is 2027-07, no row applies. But maybe to confirm no row? The lookup is first-half/second-half, not year-based. 2027-07 is outside 2026, so no reference row applies regardless. R7 item 3 applies.

Return JSON without monetary fields.

Rollout #2 100.0% passed · 2 tool calls · 9.7s · $0.0005

Component	Score	Clauses
decision	100.0%	R1 R7
exact	100.0%	R1 R7
field accuracy	100.0%	R1 R7
citations	100.0%	R1 R7
explanation	100.0%	R1 R7

Assistant

list_documents()

Reasoning

Let me start by listing documents.

Tool

[
  {"id": "6f10b60ba9a767ab-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]

Assistant

read_document(document_id="6f10b60ba9a767ab-payroll")

Reasoning

Read the payroll document.

Tool

{
  "kind": "payroll",
  "record": {"gross_pay": "6291.88", "payroll_month": "2027-07", "allowed_deduction": "228.67"}
}

Assistant

{
  "decision": "clarify",
  "reason_code": "NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE",
  "clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
  "explanation": "Payroll month 2027-07 is outside 2026 and has no applicable reference row. Please supply a payroll month within 2026 so the record can be processed."
}

Reasoning

Payroll month is 2027-07, outside 2026. R1: "Only 2026 is covered. Dates outside 2026 require clarification under R7." R7 item 3: a month without a reference row → NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE, cite R1 and R7. Missing or out-of-range dates cite R1 and R7. Reason code: NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE.

Order of checks: gross_pay present, payroll_month present, then month without reference row → clarify NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE.

Return clarify JSON.

Rollout #3 100.0% passed · 4 tool calls · 14.3s · $0.0010

Component	Score	Clauses
decision	100.0%	R1 R7
exact	100.0%	R1 R7
field accuracy	100.0%	R1 R7
citations	100.0%	R1 R7
explanation	100.0%	R1 R7

Assistant

list_documents()

Reasoning

Let me list documents first.

Tool

[
  {"id": "6f10b60ba9a767ab-payroll", "kind": "payroll"}
]

Assistant

read_document(document_id="6f10b60ba9a767ab-payroll")

Reasoning

Read it.

Tool

{
  "kind": "payroll",
  "record": {"gross_pay": "6291.88", "payroll_month": "2027-07", "allowed_deduction": "228.67"}
}

Assistant

lookup_reference(reference="second-half")lookup_reference(reference="first-half")

Reasoning

Payroll month is 2027-07, outside 2026. R1: only 2026 covered. Dates outside 2026 require clarification under R7. R7 order: 1. gross pay present. 2. payroll month present. 3. A month without a reference row → NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE, cite R1 and R7.

Check the reference: lookup_reference first-half/second-half covers 2026 only. 2027-07 has no reference row. So clarify with NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE, citing R1 and R7.

Should I still lookup? Not necessary, but let's be thorough. The rule says "A month without a reference row: return clarify NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE citing R1 and R7." 2027 is outside 2026, so no reference row applies. I can do the lookup to confirm but the rules state only 2026 is covered. I'll do one lookup to confirm rows' effective months... Actually the reference rows are first-half and second-half with effective months. Let me just do it to be safe.

Tool

{
  "reference": "second-half",
  "months": ["2026-07", "2026-12"],
  "rate": "0.08",
  "cap": "4500.00",
  "deduction": "400.00",
  "free": "1000.00",
  "upper": "2800.00",
  "middle_rate": "0.08",
  "upper_rate": "0.22"
}

Tool

{
  "reference": "first-half",
  "months": ["2026-01", "2026-06"],
  "rate": "0.07",
  "cap": "5000.00",
  "deduction": "400.00",
  "free": "1200.00",
  "upper": "3600.00",
  "middle_rate": "0.14",
  "upper_rate": "0.24"
}

Assistant

{
  "decision": "clarify",
  "reason_code": "NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE",
  "clauses": ["R1", "R7"],
  "explanation": "Payroll month 2027-07 is not covered by any reference row (rows cover 2026-01 through 2026-06 and 2026-07 through 2026-12), and dates outside 2026 cannot be extrapolated. Please supply a payroll month within 2026."
}

Reasoning

Payroll month 2027-07 is outside both rows (2026 only). NO_APPLICABLE_REFERENCE, cite R1 and R7.